|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 444
Location: [Male] East Yorkshire | Folks, - I now have 39 slebs. This is seriously too many and I shall pay for this over-indulgence by dropping another place this week (swapping with that pesky secretHM).  But look at my face ... do I look bovvered?    |
|
| |
|
Posts: 2530
| I haven't been paying much attention to the league of late and haven't been doing much trading. I mostly just keep the same celebs in the hope that they'll turn in big dividends, which seems to happen most of the time. I'm also sitting on a mountain of cash. I've become a very lazy player. At least I still have 1300 Aisleyne shares and they have returned a nice big dividend over the months...
|
|
| |
|
| As noted elsewhere Aisleyne is mentioned in today's Celebdaq news re the Geri autograph nonsense.
Her share price has risen to £4.52 anyway (highest since early December). She should give a dividend in the £1.70's this week after they add today's DS article (and assuming nothing more tomorrow or Thursday).
Does any one know why Nikki is showing a 63p potential divi? I'm a bit worried that I should give a stuff about knowing, but I've put it down to my natural thirst for esoteric knowledge. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 7952
| ofni - 20/2/2007 14:25
Does any one know why Nikki is showing a 63p potential divi? I'm a bit worried that I should give a stuff about knowing, but I've put it down to my natural thirst for esoteric knowledge.
Probably Heat magazine or something. Anyway, Aisleyne's dividend is at 1.30 now. An extra 0.24 is a bit low for today's coverage.  |
|
| |
|
| Well that's a bit stingy, they've only added 24p for today's article, so Ash's potential divi is now £1.30 for this week.
Oops - parallel posting, maringo, great minds, eh?
Heat, you reckon? Well, Nikki certainly generates more heat than light, that's for sure.
Edited by ofni 20/2/2007 14:38
|
|
| |
|
| Wonder if Aisleyne will be attending any of the following events in the Celebdaq diary for this next week?
Tonight 23 Feb
Dom Perignon - launch party
Venue: MO*VIDA, London
Apparently loads of celebs will be drinking champers – how lovely for them.
(Ash has been pictured here before)
Wednesday 28 February 2007
Amika - club launch party
Amika, London
Another chi-chi club opens its doors in London. Victoria Silvstedt is attending the launch - exciting.
(Even more exciting if Aisleyne attends)
Thursday 01 March 2007
NME Awards 2007
Hammersmith Palais, London
If the Brits were a bit scandal-light for you then we're sure something's going to happen here. Oasis, Lily Allen and hundreds of lesser indie rock stars are attending.
(Surely Invincible Radio's star team - the Diamond Duo will be in attendance - once the Aisleyne Show's over of course!)
I do hope, though that Ash can also get plenty of rest this week, and really get herself back to full health. Feet up. mug o' Horlicks, watch the telly.
|
|
| |
|
| A respectable 66th spot for Aisleyne in this week's celebdaq dividend listings. Her part of the table looks like this:
Drew Barrymore : 1.3510
Chris Evans : 1.3229
Nadine Coyle : 1.3211
BB7 Aisleyne : 1.2991
Uma Thurman : 1.2943
Olivier Martinez : 1.2748
Prince Andrew : 1.2253
Nikki is about 50 places further down with a dividend of 0.6325. Nothing for Grace or Pete.
Aisleyne's share price keeps edging upwards by the odd penny now and again, and now stands at £4.59, which almost where it was back in October. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 7952
| ofni - 23/2/2007 11:16
I do hope, though that Ash can also get plenty of rest this week, and really get herself back to full health. Feet up. mug o' Horlicks, watch the telly.
Surely Monday night would be a good time for Aisleyne to chill out in front of the TV? She might just see someone familar. |
|
| |
|
Senior Member
Posts: 444
Location: [Male] East Yorkshire | Many congratulations to IObserver for the tasty-looking seaboard craft 
(I wondered if you were going to miss it by 400,000) And to Prem for the wad of notes And, of course, to all the others in the FAKERS league who've move up two positions thanks to the sharks experts' extravagance  |
|
| |
|
Senior Member
Posts: 321
| Thank you Deeb,
I really don't believe that I gained a virtual yacht and a virtual wad of cash in just two weeks  . I would like to virtually invite all FAKERS's to join me on a virtual cruise to virtually celebrate.
Furthermore, I am pleased to here that Aisleyne has a actual photo in the Daily Star winning her some dividend's again this week. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 7952
| No dividend for today's Daily Star appearance, as of yet! 
The Celebdaq staff are obviously too busy trying on high-heels and stethoscopes. |
|
| |
|
| maringo - 26/2/2007 18:03
No dividend for today's Daily Star appearance, as of yet!
The Celebdaq staff are obviously too busy trying on high-heels and stethoscopes.
As I posted on the other thread, Dr Maringo, I have emailed the hamsters about the omission. |
|
| |
|
| ....... and guess what.
Aisleyne now shows a potential dividend of 0.47.
Cause and effect? Coincidence? No matter. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 7952
| ofni - 26/2/2007 19:12
....... and guess what.
Aisleyne now shows a potential dividend of 0.47.
Cause and effect? Coincidence? No matter.
They're not normally this late, so your email may well have had an effect. I kneel down before you in admiration.
Hang on, are those high heels you're wearing? |
|
| |
|
Senior Member
Posts: 444
Location: [Male] East Yorkshire | Alot of those celeb data graphs are out-of-date.
Last updated 13th Feb - very misleading. :(
If the automatic stuff is unreliable as well as the inch-counting, we're all in a lottery
No wonder everyone's beating me  |
|
| |
|
| maringo - 26/2/2007 21:12
ofni - 26/2/2007 19:12
....... and guess what.
Aisleyne now shows a potential dividend of 0.47.
Cause and effect? Coincidence? No matter.
They're not normally this late, so your email may well have had an effect. I kneel down before you in admiration.
Hang on, are those high heels you're wearing?
Sorry, can't hear you. Drat, forgot to take the stethoscope earpieces out! |
|
| |
|
| The Celebdaq Board have just announced a major change in the way they measure press coverage, and I reckon it's NOT good news for Aisleyne's dividends.
"The Board is pleased to announce the introduction of a new system for measuring press coverage. Currently a manual system (chewed pencils + rulers + hamsters) is in operation but on Friday 2nd March an automated system which measures the number of times a celebrity's name is mentioned will be introduced."
Aisleyne has scored well on the previous column inch measurement, because her appearances are picture-based. Measurement of "mentions" is clearly going to shift things in favour of those celebs who attract lots of "stories" rather than articles with pictures. I fear this will work against the kind of coverage Aisleyne attracts.
They add the following:
"We have taken steps to ensure that the new system is comparable to the old in terms of dividend payments generated but we would ask you to be patient while the new system beds down. On Friday, launch day, we will publish updated FAQs which will give more detail on how dividend payments will be generated in the future."
We shall see. Full announcement here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/celebdaq/news/statements/2007/02/27/41135.shtm...
|
|
| |
|
Senior Member
Posts: 321
| If a picture paints a thousand words, then Celebdaq couldn't stop counting pictures. |
|
| |
|
Posts: 7952
| Thanks for the info!
It could possibly have a detrimental effect on her dividends. However, they're missing stuff out with the current system (eg. today's mention in Heat magazine). So the automation could actually help her in some ways.
My main worry is that a lot of journalists can't spell her name properly (as in the recent CBB5 article in OK magazine). |
|
| |
|
Senior Member
Posts: 262
| That's a liberty, surely the amount of physical space the article takes up was the best way to go. It's a shame.
Edited by dannyk 27/2/2007 18:52
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 7952
| If it's now automated, surely they could add some more publications? With the emphasis in that sentence on "more".  |
|
| |
|
| It actually looks like a cost cutting exercise to me, as it moves from a "labour intensive" to an automated measure. Some redundant hamsters, it seems; no wonder they've been getting sloppy recently. |
|
| |
|
| maringo - 27/2/2007 18:53
If it's now automated, surely they could add some more publications? With the emphasis in that sentence on "more".
You mean it would be "closer" to an accurate measurement? |
|
| |
|
Senior Member
Posts: 321
| ofni - 27/2/2007 18:57 maringo - 27/2/2007 18:53 If it's now automated, surely they could add some more publications? With the emphasis in that sentence on "more". You mean it would be "closer" to an accurate measurement? OK Now! I like the celebrity mag puns.
Edited by Interested Observer 27/2/2007 19:01
|
|
| |
|
Posts: 7952
| ofni - 27/2/2007 18:57
You mean it would be "closer" to an accurate measurement?
Don't mention Closer magazine to me! They seal up today's copy, so you're forced to buy it to see whether the Aisleyne pics are in it. Then you open it up and get sweet FA!  |
|
| |
Aisleyne Celebdaq thread
